 CRB seeks comments on "Elevator music" royalties ·Feb 12, 11:05 AM From the Broadcast Law Blog, by David Oxenford: Last week, the Copyright Royalty Board published an order seeking comments on a proposed settlement establishing the royalties for “Business Establishment Services.” Essentially, this is the royalty paid by a service which digitally delivers music to businesses to be played in stores, restaurants, retail establishments, offices and similar establishments (sometimes referred to as “background” or “elevator” music,)… The proposed settlement would essentially carry the current rates forward for the period 2009-2013. These rates Some might wonder how a royalty of 10% royalty can be justified – and why it shouldn’t set some sort of precedent for the Internet radio services about which we have written so much here. .. For Business Establishment Services, it’s not the standard that is different – it’s the royalty itself. Under the DMCA,… the royalty is paid only for the “ephemeral copies” – those transitory copies made in the digital transmission process. That is different than the royalty for all of the other digital services, where fees are paid for both the performance (under Section 114 of the Copyright Act) and the ephemeral copies (under Section 112). To some extent, the Business Establishment royalty reveals other inconsistencies in the law. In the recent decisions on Internet radio and satellite radio, the CRB determined that the ephemeral copies had no value, allocating all of the royalty to the rights under Section 114. This is consistent with other Also, the law establishes that there is no performance right in the sound recording. However, as in the over-the-air broadcast services, there is a royalty that must be paid for the use of the copyright in the composition. Thus, the stores and other business establishments themselves have to pay royalties to ASCAP, BMI and SESAC for the performance of copyrighted works (though the services often pay that royalty on behalf of the user). Comments on the proposed royalty are due on February 29. Read the entire post at the Broadcast Law Blog here. share: del.icio.us.  Reddit  Digg  Yahoo  Wink  Windows  Google  Newsvine 
Comment Other stories RAIN 8/19: Top webcasters hold their ground in July's webcast metrics ratings RAIN 8/18: Pandora tells press it's nearing "pull-the-plug" decision RAIN 8/15: iPhone doubles Pandora mobile listening; experts say mobile wi-fi should scare FM, satellite RAIN 8/14: Net radio's educated, affluent, at-work audience impacts July PPM RAIN 8/13: CBS Radio says growing digital revenues spurred by online ratings spike RAIN 8/12: For Pandora iPhone ads, the future may be "all about ears" RAIN 8/11: Wilhelms: Labels will take at least 50% of a radio royalty, but Simson's op-ed never mentions it RAIN 8/7: Salem's Internet gains ease pain of losses on radio side Bob Bellin on the satellite radio merger RAIN 8/6: "Gulf" between viewpoints may stall royalty compromise, says Oxenford |
require the payment of 10% of a services revenue (essentially what they are paid by the businesses for the delivery of the music) with a minimum annual payment of $10,000.
statements made by the Copyright Office suggesting that ephemeral copies, which are inherent in the transmission process but otherwise are of no real use to the consumer, have no value. But, here, the royalty is valued at a full 10% of the revenue of the service.
