 NAB releases proposed broadcast royalty terms ·Aug 16, 12:13 PM SEVERAL POINTS RELATE DIRECTLY TO ONLINE STREAMINGFollowing a meeting with its board in response to music industry efforts to gain a royalty for on-air play of copyright recordings, the NAB has publicly released “proposed terms under consideration” for a settlement — several of which have implications for online radio.
H.R. 848, the “Performance Rights Act,” which would compel broadcasters to pay royalties to the owners of copyright recordings they play, is in the House now. Though more than enough members of Congress have pledged to vote against the bill, the NAB fears it could be tacked on to a far less controversial, non-partisan bill and get passed (a real danger in a lame-duck Congress). It’s generally accepted that broadcasters would rather craft a deal in which they can negotiate terms than have Congress foist terms on them. Radio-Info reports the NAB’s five points of its proposed terms. Those that pertain directly to Internet radio include: Broadcasters now await the music industry’s counter-proposal. Read Radio-Info’s full coverage here. While it’s logical that only NAB-member broadcasters would be eligible for any settlement between the music industry and the NAB, the “Internet-only” radio community could benefit as well. A manageable, reasonable performance royalty for radio would stand in stark contrast to the onerous, disproportionate rates under which webcasters like Pandora and AccuRadio currently operate, making the disparity that much clearer to lawmakers and voters. share: del.icio.us.  Reddit  Digg  Yahoo  Wink  Windows  Google  Newsvine 
CommentCommenting is closed for this article.  Other blog entries Spotify is an "online music service," but that doesn't make it "radio" How Pandora could become a $70 stock (in a few years) Late-night addendum to the Pandora analysis: "Enterprise value" Memorial Day cliche' Zune's failure proves the way onto devices, for radio, is apps Great Moments in Business Journalism VXIII -- Pandora version Great Moments in Business Journalism XVII NAB is negotiating a VERY FAIR deal with musicFIRST Simulcasts aren't working Book your TUESDAY travel to Washington, DC! |
I am beyond fed up with the money hungry idiots in the entertainment business grabbing for every buck they think their ugly paws are capable of coming in contact with. Nobody goes to a dentist that charges a royalty for every day you go without a tooth ache and nobody has their vehicle repaired by a mechanic that charges royalties for every day you can drive your vehicle between breakdowns. Who came up with his outdated discriminatory method of padding the bank accounts of singers and actors and such. It’s long past the time when they got both feet pointed in the same direction on planet earth. Nobody else, no other industry operates under a stupid royalty plan and neither should the entertainers. I say quit playing their music, quit going to their movies and they’ll soon get the message. The entertainment busines is FLAT OUT of control. Broadcasting is no longer broad – casting. If you don’t live in certain geographical areas (ie – the good ole USA) on this planet earth, you’re not entitled to listen to a bit streamed radio station because some brain dead slob in an ivory tower isn’t able to collect his pound of flesh. It’s time we all got together and in “unison”, blew the freekin wax out of this bastards ears.
— Arnie Jackson · Aug 30, 01:47 PM · #