Webcast rates enter radio royalty debate ·Jun 13, 02:30 PM BY MICHAEL SCHMITT share: del.icio.us. Reddit Digg Yahoo Wink Windows Google Newsvine
CommentCommenting is closed for this article. Other blog entries Spotify is an "online music service," but that doesn't make it "radio" How Pandora could become a $70 stock (in a few years) Late-night addendum to the Pandora analysis: "Enterprise value" Memorial Day cliche' Zune's failure proves the way onto devices, for radio, is apps Great Moments in Business Journalism VXIII -- Pandora version Great Moments in Business Journalism XVII NAB is negotiating a VERY FAIR deal with musicFIRST Simulcasts aren't working Book your TUESDAY travel to Washington, DC! |



fees raged yesterday, at least one member of Congress held an open ear to internet radio’s pleas—Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) (pictured) expressed a desire for congressional action to change net radio’s performance royalty rates. She stated, “The industry that’s really in trouble today is Internet radio.” Her position may be due to Pandora and other webcasters’ lobbying efforts. Pandora’s chief executive Joe Kennedy and founder Tim Westergren have both been making the rounds at Congress, trying to persuade legislators about the disparity between net and satellite radio royalty fees. Westergren has declared that 70% of Pandora’s revenue would go towards paying performance fees (











