
Veteran entertainment lawyer calls Simson out on his math ·May 14, 08:56 AM
Posted by: Paul Maloney
From
P2PNet: "Do you remember taking math tests? Specifically,
do you remember the warning you always got before you started?
"As I remember, the idea was that the teacher would
be able to tell if you understood the concept or just guessed the
answer (or cribbed it from the smart kid in front of you). You had
to demonstrate that you had some grasp of the subject, and just weren’t making things up as you went along,
hoping to guess the solution without knowing the reasons why.
"It’s time to tell SoundExchange, SHOW US YOUR WORK!
"This time the test is all about the real
impact of H.R.
2060, the Internet Radio Equality Act (IREA)…
SoundExchange’s
"remarkable numbers"
"In his passionate, and increasingly lonely, defense
of the CRB Internet Radio royalty rates, John Simson [pictured right],
SoundExchange’s executive director, has started throwing around some remarkable
numbers [see SoundExchange press release here].
If he’s right, H.R. 2060 will put every
U.S. recording artist into debt to the big bad webcasters
who are going to get a gigantic rebate on their 2006 Internet royalty
payments…
"He
was apparently able to keep a straight face when he blamed
the crashing of CD sales on the rise of Internet radio
while ignoring every other possible cause…
"It really is ironic that Simson is reduced to publicly
suggesting small webcasters may be being
used to do the bidding of the big webcasters as if, given
his own organization’s close ties to the RIAA, he thought this kind
of subterfuge was a bad thing…
"Nevertheless, beyond all that, is Simson right about
IREA? Is it going to be a disaster for artists? He gives us numbers that support his argument that it will be. But are
they real numbers? Nobody knows, because he
isn’t showing us his work*…
"One good reason for that secrecy is that it permits
them to make up numbers when they need them. Like right now, when
all the hard work they’ve put in trying
to cut Internet radio down to size is at risk of going
for nothing because a lot of people don’t agree with John Simson
that there are too many Internet radio stations.
Simson says…
"John Simson says the IREA is going to be a $50
million dollar windfall for ‘big webcasters.’
"How
was that figure calculated? Does that mean they’re going to
be asking for, and getting, $50 million back from SoundExchange
for payments already made? Is
it just that they won’t have to pay that much more that would have
been due under the CRB? Is that windfall just
for 2006, or does it go through 2010?..
"Is that total calculated with regard to the possibility
that those big webcasters would probably
end up signing direct licenses with the major labels
that would permit the webcasters a discount
from the CRB rates and permit the labels to cut out the
artists completely?..
"Simson says passage of IREA means that artists are
going to have to write refund checks.
"If the checks for 2006 that’ve already been paid to
the artists were on the basis of royalties already paid, how does
the failure to get an increase on the previous rates result in the need
for a rebate? This
sounds like the basest of scare tactics…
"Simson says ‘small webcasters’ only
paid 2% of the royalties in 2006.
"Extrapolating SoundExchange’s 1st Quarter 2006 royalty
statistics, total 2006 royalties were approximately $56 million.
Two percent of that is about $1.1 million. Live365 claims to have paid, just by itself, over
$1 million to SoundExchange…
"Simson says artists, on the average, received $360
in royalties last year…
"The number he’s quoting now just doesn’t match up with
other numbers they’ve used in the past. It is impossible to tell
which is accurate and which is made up unless
they SHOW THE WORK.
"p2pnet’s Jon Newton… saw the reserve for unregistered
artists and labels was $5.7 million [SoundExchange statement here],
which was more than ten times higher [here]
than the amount that SoundExchange claimed
was at risk when it started that half-hearted attempt
to find people before the royalties for webcasts before March 31,
2000 were forfeited…
"It just don’t add up. By Simson’s ‘average,’ that $5.7
million reserve would be sufficient to cover over 13,000 ‘average
artists’ or over 4,000 more than SoundExchange
admitted they couldn’t find in October, 2006.
"Furthermore, that $5.7 million is a full 40%
of the entire royalty pool. In other words, SoundExchange
is admitting it can’t pay out 40% of the
money it’s collected because it hasn’t found the people
who earned it…
"Simson has said he seeks transparency in SoundExchange
affairs. This is the time and place to start, if he was serious…
They’ve got to show their work."
Read veteran entertainment and music lawyer Fred
Wilhelms‘ entire article at P2PNet here.
Reader Feedback
“SoundExchange is inciting labels and artists against webcasters…”
Here’s feedback from SomaFM’s Rusty Hodge on John Simson’s math…
In a recent letter to SoundExchange members, SoundExchange
says about H.R. 2060:
"For 2006 they [the big webcasters] want
you to give back $12 million when all they would owe under
the new CRB rates is $850,000."
This implies: For 2006, big webcasters would
have owed $12,850,000.
Under the new H.R. 2060/IREA rates (.33 cents / hour), SX
says big webcasters would owe SX only $850,000: $850,000 / .0033 = 257,575,758 aggregate tuning hours for the major webcasters for 2006.
But 257,575,758 at the old (2005)
ATH rate (which big webcasters paid so far in 2006) was:
257,575,758 (ATH) * 0.0117 (ATH rate) = $3,013,636
So by this math, the major radio services seem to
have paid $3 million in 2006, not $12 million SoundExchange is saying they paid (if the $850,000 number is true).
Also, based on the current 2006 rates, assuming an average
of X songs per hour, here’s the 2006 fees you get:
$2,472,727.27 (at 12 songs per hour)
$3,090,909.09 (at 15 songs per hour)
So there is no way by this math
that webcasters paid $12 million — unless they’re figuring the $500
per channel minimum for the other missing $9 million bucks, or 18,000
distinct channels. (Maybe that extra $9 million comes from Pandora?)
Here’s feedback from
SomaFM’s Rusty Hodge on John Simson’s math…
However, these ATH numbers do not
seem accurate for the full year, in the January ’07 Arbitron
Net Radio Ratings release [here],
they showed average concurrent listeners from 6a-Midnight:
Yahoo Launchcast:
164,800
AOL Radio Network:
159,400
Clear
Channel Online Music and Radio: 82,000
Live365:
67,900
Total: 474,100 average concurrent
listeners, which if calculated in aggregate tuning hours,
would be about 347,041,200 PER MONTH (albeit that number is surely a little high, because usually Midnight-6am
AQH is lower than 6am-Midnight AQH).
Extrapolating, that means the major services in 2006 had on
the order of 3.5-4 billion tuning hours in
2006. Based on the 2005 rate which big webcasters paid
already for 2006, and assuming only 3 billion total listening hours,
that would be $35,100,000 in royalties they
paid in 2006. Under the CRB decision, that would go up
to $36,900,000
for 2006, and the new proposed IREA/H.R. 2060 rate of .0033/listener
hour would bring that down to $9,900,000…
or lessen the 2006 amounts paid from $35 million to about $10 million.
Which still doesn’t match the $12
million they’re talking about!
UNLESS, Arbitron’s numbers include non-music programming,
and that makes up a
majority of what AOL/Yahoo play; OR, more likely, the big webcasters
have direct-licensed much of their content at reduced rates (possibly
outside of SoundExchange),
and only pay SX for performances of tracks they don’t have direct
licenses with. Still, the numbers don’t make sense.
Given all that, where did the SX numbers come from? They’re
obviously not deliberately misrepresenting, so there must be some
theoretical basis for them. Am I missing
something here? Shouldn’t they say, this new bill will
reduce their rates from $3 million to $850,000; or from $35 million
to $10 million? The new ATH rates are 28% of what the old rate was.
SoundExchange is inciting the labels and
artists against webcasters using numbers that don’t seem
to make sense, and don’t back up their figures with data.By villianizing
large webcasters at the expense of small webcasters, the only thing
that will happen is the small webcasters will get screwed.
share: del.icio.us. Reddit Digg Yahoo Wink Windows Google Newsvine
Commenting is closed for this article.
|