Enjoy great online radio at AccuRadio




Veteran entertainment lawyer calls Simson out on his math
·May 14, 08:56 AM
Posted by: Paul Maloney


From P2PNet: "Do you remember taking math tests? Specifically, do you remember the warning you always got before you started?

"As I remember, the idea was that the teacher would be able to tell if you understood the concept or just guessed the answer (or cribbed it from the smart kid in front of you). You had to demonstrate that you had some grasp of the subject, and just weren’t making things up as you went along, hoping to guess the solution without knowing the reasons why.

"It’s time to tell SoundExchange, SHOW US YOUR WORK!

"This time the test is all about the real impact of H.R. 2060, the Internet Radio Equality Act (IREA)

SoundExchange’s "remarkable numbers"
"In his passionate, and increasingly lonely, defense of the CRB Internet Radio royalty rates, John Simson [pictured right], SoundExchange’s executive director, has started throwing around some remarkable numbers [see SoundExchange press release here]. If he’s right, H.R. 2060 will put every U.S. recording artist into debt to the big bad webcasters who are going to get a gigantic rebate on their 2006 Internet royalty payments…

"He was apparently able to keep a straight face when he blamed the crashing of CD sales on the rise of Internet radio while ignoring every other possible cause…

"It really is ironic that Simson is reduced to publicly suggesting small webcasters may be being used to do the bidding of the big webcasters as if, given his own organization’s close ties to the RIAA, he thought this kind of subterfuge was a bad thing…

"Nevertheless, beyond all that, is Simson right about IREA? Is it going to be a disaster for artists? He gives us numbers that support his argument that it will be. But are they real numbers? Nobody knows, because he isn’t showing us his work*…

"One good reason for that secrecy is that it permits them to make up numbers when they need them. Like right now, when all the hard work they’ve put in trying to cut Internet radio down to size is at risk of going for nothing because a lot of people don’t agree with John Simson that there are too many Internet radio stations.

Simson says…
"John Simson says the IREA is going to be a $50 million dollar windfall for ‘big webcasters.’

"How was that figure calculated? Does that mean they’re going to be asking for, and getting, $50 million back from SoundExchange for payments already made? Is it just that they won’t have to pay that much more that would have been due under the CRB? Is that windfall just for 2006, or does it go through 2010?..

"Is that total calculated with regard to the possibility that those big webcasters would probably end up signing direct licenses with the major labels that would permit the webcasters a discount from the CRB rates and permit the labels to cut out the artists completely?..

"Simson says passage of IREA means that artists are going to have to write refund checks.

"If the checks for 2006 that’ve already been paid to the artists were on the basis of royalties already paid, how does the failure to get an increase on the previous rates result in the need for a rebate? This sounds like the basest of scare tactics…

"Simson says ‘small webcasters’ only paid 2% of the royalties in 2006.

"Extrapolating SoundExchange’s 1st Quarter 2006 royalty statistics, total 2006 royalties were approximately $56 million. Two percent of that is about $1.1 million. Live365 claims to have paid, just by itself, over $1 million to SoundExchange…

"Simson says artists, on the average, received $360 in royalties last year…

"The number he’s quoting now just doesn’t match up with other numbers they’ve used in the past. It is impossible to tell which is accurate and which is made up unless they SHOW THE WORK.

"p2pnet’s Jon Newton… saw the reserve for unregistered artists and labels was $5.7 million [SoundExchange statement here], which was more than ten times higher [here] than the amount that SoundExchange claimed was at risk when it started that half-hearted attempt to find people before the royalties for webcasts before March 31, 2000 were forfeited…

"It just don’t add up. By Simson’s ‘average,’ that $5.7 million reserve would be sufficient to cover over 13,000 ‘average artists’ or over 4,000 more than SoundExchange admitted they couldn’t find in October, 2006.

"Furthermore, that $5.7 million is a full 40% of the entire royalty pool. In other words, SoundExchange is admitting it can’t pay out 40% of the money it’s collected because it hasn’t found the people who earned it…

"Simson has said he seeks transparency in SoundExchange affairs. This is the time and place to start, if he was serious… They’ve got to show their work."

Read veteran entertainment and music lawyer Fred Wilhelms‘ entire article at P2PNet here.



Reader Feedback

“SoundExchange is inciting labels and artists against webcasters…”


Here’s feedback from SomaFM’s Rusty Hodge on John Simson’s math…

In a recent letter to SoundExchange members, SoundExchange says about H.R. 2060:



"For 2006 they [the big webcasters] want you to give back Rusty Hodge$12 million when all they would owe under the new CRB rates is $850,000."

This implies: For 2006, big webcasters would have owed $12,850,000.

Under the new H.R. 2060/IREA rates (.33 cents / hour), SX says big webcasters would owe SX only $850,000: $850,000 / .0033 = 257,575,758 aggregate tuning hours for the major webcasters for 2006.

But 257,575,758 at the old (2005) ATH rate (which big webcasters paid so far in 2006) was: 257,575,758 (ATH) * 0.0117 (ATH rate) = $3,013,636

So by this math, the major radio services seem to have paid $3 million in 2006, not $12 million SoundExchange is saying they paid (if the $850,000 number is true).

Also, based on the current 2006 rates, assuming an average of X songs per hour, here’s the 2006 fees you get:

$2,472,727.27 (at 12 songs per hour)
$3,090,909.09 (at 15 songs per hour)

So there is no way by this math that webcasters paid $12 million — unless they’re figuring the $500 per channel minimum for the other missing $9 million bucks, or 18,000 distinct channels. (Maybe that extra $9 million comes from Pandora?)

Here’s feedback from SomaFM’s Rusty Hodge on John Simson’s math…


However, these ATH numbers
do not seem accurate for the full year, in the January ’07 Arbitron Net Radio Ratings release [here], they showed average soma fmconcurrent listeners from 6a-Midnight:

Yahoo Launchcast: 164,800
AOL Radio Network: 159,400
Clear Channel Online Music and Radio: 82,000
Live365: 67,900

Total: 474,100 average concurrent listeners, which if calculated in aggregate tuning hours, would be about 347,041,200 PER MONTH (albeit that number is surely a little high, because usually Midnight-6am AQH is lower than 6am-Midnight AQH).

Extrapolating, that means the major services in 2006 had on the order of 3.5-4 billion tuning hours in 2006. Based on the 2005 rate which big webcasters paid already for 2006, and assuming only 3 billion total listening hours, that would be $35,100,000 in royalties they paid in 2006. Under the CRB decision, that would go up to $36,900,000
for 2006, and the new proposed IREA/H.R. 2060 rate of .0033/listener hour would bring that down to $9,900,000… or lessen the 2006 amounts paid from $35 million to about $10 million.

Which still doesn’t match the $12 million they’re talking about!

UNLESS, Arbitron’s numbers include non-music programming, and that makes up a
majority of what AOL/Yahoo play; OR, more likely, the big webcasters have direct-licensed much of their content at reduced rates (possibly outside of SoundExchange),
and only pay SX for performances of tracks they don’t have direct licenses with. Still, the numbers don’t make sense.

Given all that, where did the SX numbers come from? They’re obviously not deliberately misrepresenting, so there must be some theoretical basis for them. Am I missing something here? Shouldn’t they say, this new bill will reduce their rates from $3 million to $850,000; or from $35 million to $10 million? The new ATH rates are 28% of what the old rate was.

SoundExchange is inciting the labels and artists against webcasters using numbers that don’t seem to make sense, and don’t back up their figures with data.By villianizing large webcasters at the expense of small webcasters, the only thing that will happen is the small webcasters will get screwed.

 

Rusty Hodge
SomaFM





share:  del.icio.us.  post this at del.icio.us  Reddit  post this at Reddit  Digg  post this at Digg  Yahoo   post this at Yahoo! my web  Wink   post this at Wink  Windows   post this at Windows Live  Google  post this at Google Bookmarks  Newsvine  post this at Newsvine

Commenting is closed for this article.


Blogroll
AccuRadio is powered by...
Conference schedules
Sep. 12 SF Music Tech Summit: San Francisco, CA
Sep. 13 RAIN Summit Chicago @ NAB/RAB RadioShow: Chicago, IL
Sep. 14-16 NAB/RAB RadioShow: Chicago, IL
Sep. 24 IBS Radio/Webcast Conf.: Chicago, IL
Oct. 6-7 Digital Music Forum West: Los Angeles, CA
Oct. 13-14 Digital Content Summit/Music: New York, NY
Oct. 18-22 CMJ Music Marathon: New York, NY
Oct. 27-30 CBI Fall Convention: Orlando, FL
Nov. 5 IBS Radio/Webcast Conf.: Boston, MA
Nov. 19 IBS Radio/Webcast Conf.: New York, NY
Dec. 3 IBS Radio/Webcast Conf.: Los Angeles, CA